Zoë Schiffer: Then it started to jam a small bit. Or I don't cognize nan correct term, but it did malfunction, right?
Andy Greenberg: Yeah, it did jam and it misfired respective times. We reloaded it and I fired it a bunch much times. It would fire, and past misfire, and fire, and misfire. We did a bunch of troubleshooting, but yet we did get it moving arsenic a afloat semi-automatic handgun that could really quiet a full mag worthy of rounds.
Zoë Schiffer: You besides pointed retired that Brian Thompson's alleged killer—their weapon besides malfunctioned. It looked like, from nan videos, that they had practiced a adjacent magnitude because they were wholly unperturbed by nan acquisition that you had, wherever nan weapon jammed, and past you had to troubleshoot, and past support going.
Andy Greenberg: Right. Once we had gotten nan weapon moving arsenic a existent semi-automatic, past we put nan silencer on, our 3D-printed silencer. The silencer, based connected nan measurement that it attaches to nan muzzle, it does really forestall nan descent from getting its afloat scope of motion. It nary longer really worked arsenic a existent semi-automatic weapon. I had to, each clip I pulled nan trigger, propulsion backmost nan slide, rack nan weapon arsenic they say, which ejects a casing and pushes a caller information into nan chamber, fresh to beryllium fired. You person to manually rack it each time.
But erstwhile I looked astatine nan surveillance video of allegedly Luigi Mangione sidesplitting Brian Thompson, aliases whoever that was successful that video, you tin spot that they do precisely that. They propulsion backmost nan descent pinch each shot. In fact, they look to beryllium afloat prepared to do that. They don't hesitate astatine all. It was this eerie emotion of realizing that we had arrived astatine precisely nan spot wherever Brian Thompson's slayer did. It was this very unnerving emotion of realizing that I was carrying retired precisely nan aforesaid process, I was going done precisely nan aforesaid sensations of recoil, and racking, and firing again that I was seeing successful this existent execution video.
Zoë Schiffer: Talk to maine astir what proponents of shade guns say. Why are they for this untraceable and perchance really vulnerable technology?
Andy Greenberg: I deliberation there's a full scope of group who are willing successful shade guns and 3D-printed guns. Cody Wilson, nan creator of nan first afloat 3D-printed gun, I was location successful 2013 erstwhile he fired for nan first clip nan Liberator, this afloat plastic, afloat 3D-printed one-shot pistol. He wants to destruct nan state. He's a full-on extremist Libertarian who believes that really making weapon power impossible, but demonstrating that it is fundamentally impossible. He tin usage that arsenic a lever to show that “all authorities is impossible.”
But past you talk to personification for illustration Print, Shoot, Repeat, who was nan 1 who helped america retired successful this experiment. He's besides a existent advocator for 3D-printed guns. But he told me, “I for illustration this because I for illustration nan thought of being capable to make my ain guns astatine home. You tin research pinch nan process, and build guns that are not commercially available, and do it pinch afloat anonymity and privacy.” I did inquire him, “Doesn't that besides airs a existent risk? Doesn't nan expertise for anybody fundamentally to make a weapon astatine location pinch anonymity and privateness mean that they tin usage it to perpetrate a crime?” He, for illustration a batch of weapon advocates I deliberation successful general, his reply was, “Well, state is dangerous,” and that's nan American way, essentially.