Woman Angers Coworkers After Letting 5-Year-Old Niece Attend Kid-Free Birthday Party

A female turned to nan Reddit organization for support pursuing unexpected backlash from her coworkers aft a day statement she hosted. In her post, she wondered if she was successful nan incorrect for “allowing my five-year-old niece astatine my coworker’s nary kids day party” that took spot astatine her home.

She explained that her coworker Max was turning 60, and his woman Mary wanted to big nan ceremony astatine her and her husband’s house. “Our location is overmuch bigger than theirs and my hubby precocious sewage a caller grill and smoker,” she wrote, adding that some she and her hubby were excited to entertain and make usage of their caller setup.

But location was 1 clear rule: nary children. “Our location isn’t group up for kids to beryllium location and we weren’t going to spell done nan hassle of babe proofing it,” she said. She mentioned they person “many breakables” and that her hubby keeps “his grandpa’s beard postulation connected display,” which made a child-free gathering nan safest choice.

Mary and Max wholly agreed pinch nan rule. “Especially since location would beryllium intoxicant and they besides wanted to bask nan statement without kids moving astir screaming nan full time,” nan poster explained. Every impermanent was informed up of time, and though immoderate parents pushed back, nan mates “held beardown to nan nary kids rule.”

Despite nan early tension, plans for nan statement moved guardant smoothly. OP's husband’s sister-in-law, Jesse, was moreover asked to make nan day cake. In nan post, nan female said Jesse is “an astonishing baker” who has created desserts for galore of their activity events and birthdays.

On nan time of nan party, things started perfectly. Then, Jesse arrived — moving a small down schedule — pinch nan barroom and her young daughter, Emma, successful tow.

“Jesse arrives a small precocious pinch nan barroom and her 5-year-old girl Emma,” nan female shared. Despite nan strict no-kids policy, she explained that Jesse was only location for a short clip and that Emma was incredibly well-behaved during their little visit.

“Her and Emma are only location astatine astir 45 minutes and Emma was very good behaved,” she wrote. “Jesse helps maine return a fewer pictures of Max and Mary pinch nan barroom earlier helping maine trim and service it and leaves.”

The female emphasized that Emma wasn’t treated for illustration a impermanent astatine nan statement but much for illustration a helper who accompanied her mom to present nan cake. “The only logic Emma moreover came into nan location was because she was helping her mom transportation things,” she said. Once inside, Emma “gave my hubby a hug and sat astatine our small meal nook and started reference a book she brought pinch her.”

Still, nan adjacent time brought unexpected tension. “The time aft nan statement I spell to activity and immoderate of nan moms are giving maine nasty looks,” she recalled. Confused astatine first, she later learned from Mary that respective coworkers were upset that she had “allowed my 5-year-old niece to ‘attend nan party’ erstwhile maine and my hubby were nan ones that were truthful adamant that location were to beryllium nary kids.”

The big insisted she doesn’t deliberation she did thing wrong. “Neither does my hubby aliases Max,” she wrote, though she noted that “Mary is successful betwixt connected nan situation.”

The poster stood by her reasoning, repeating that Emma “wasn’t disturbing anyone and wasn’t moreover location that long.” To her, nan norm against children wasn’t astir being unfair — it was astir practicality and safety. Having 1 quiet kid extremity by concisely to thief her mom didn’t consciousness for illustration breaking that boundary.

Never miss a communicative — motion up for PEOPLE's free regular newsletter to enactment up-to-date connected nan champion of what PEOPLE has to offer​​, from personage news to compelling quality liking stories.

In nan comments, Reddit users mostly agreed pinch her perspective. One commenter wrote, “There’s a immense quality betwixt nan big allowing 1 of their ain family members to travel complete for a short clip (someone who they cognize and person astir apt had complete before) versus hosting nan guests’ random children they person ne'er met.”

Another commenter echoed nan aforesaid sentiment, saying, “NTA because it sounds for illustration they fundamentally conscionable dropped disconnected nan barroom and left. If they had decently attended nan statement it would alteration my vote.”